Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helga Feddersen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 21:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Helga Feddersen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails Notability. SkyWalker (talk) 11:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see some POV issues, but those can easily be fixed. This woman had multiple stage, film and TV roles and she's a writer. You definitely need a a more detailed reason for calling her non-notable. - Mgm|(talk) 11:37, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Then all means please add reliable source to the article. For 1 year the article has been quiet no source is added no improvement has been made. I use AFD to bring others to attention. I don't like the articles been deleted but if there is no improvement it is sad thing. --SkyWalker (talk) 12:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That is not what AFD is for. See Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions (particularly WP:NOEFFORT). If you want to draw attention to it, you can list it for cleanup or post at a relevant WikiProject. Having it deleted rather than properly addressed is even sadder than the article not getting attention. - Mgm|(talk) 12:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * CommentI did a search on google. I could not find a source. I have seen article getting deleted which the person has acted in many roles but it was deleted for no third party source. So if you can find anything for that matter do add them. I find it useless on addressing it on WikiProjects because no one takes any action to do anything. Also searching for the book "Hello, here's Helga" which it claims is a best seller. I could not find anything --SkyWalker (talk) 12:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. This, this, and this all point to her notability. D ARTH P ANDA talk 15:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - needs a lot more sourcing though. This article needs some serious TLC.  CorpITGuy (talk) 17:32, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Load of sources available from a Google News Archive search as well as the Google Books search linked by Darth Panda, which finds an entry in a paper encyclopedia, one of the strongest possible indicators of notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.