Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helios Eclipse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Helios Eclipse
Appears to be non-encyclopaedic fancruft/fanfiction from some fictional universe. PROD tag was deleted without comment by an anonymous user. Sandstein 14:57, 14 February 2006 (UTC) Sounds like bad anime. Is there any chance this a legit new anime or manga? Otherwise delete as fancruft. Thatcher131 15:51, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Establishes too little, if any, context or notability, way too specific. J I P  | Talk 15:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment You'd never know it from the article, but it appears this is a Japanese released manga by Kaoru (Kaoru Mori perhaps?) that some fanboys at www.mangarebels.com are in the process of translating to english and posting for download. No idea or opinion of the notability of this, but I'll slap context and cleanup tags on this.  If kept it should read more encyclopedic.--Isotope23 17:40, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It's authored by Karya KAORU, according to the cover shot.--Isotope23 17:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' King of Hearts | (talk) 00:19, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No context. -- Krash (Talk) 01:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per my original submission. Sandstein 08:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for non-notability, even if there IS context.  freshgavin ΓΛĿЌ 10:28, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per freshgavin -- Ruby   15:06, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ruby Compu  te  r  Jo  e  18:30, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. TheRingess 07:51, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: relisting 24/02/06. The article has changed significantly since the last person opined, and enough people relied on a "no context" reasoning.  The question is: should this be deleted even though there is now sufficient context?  I don't feel that question is answered by the above discussion. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 08:27, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I still vote delete as per freshgavin above. Sandstein 08:48, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Change my vote from delete to abstain. How can I judge the notability of a maylasian comic book?  There may be a lot of english language graphic novels in wikipedia that aren't notable in Maylasia.  Thatcher131 14:05, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per freshgavin. --Ter e nce Ong 14:23, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Despite the cleanup, I have to agree with Freshgavin. -- Kinu  t /c  01:21, 25 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.