Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helixq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete a7 (nonnotable), g11 (self-promotion), WP:SNOW. See my comment at Articles for deletion/Dr sol adoni. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Helixq

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable computer language. No citation here of independent WP:reliable sources, and virtually no pertinent hits in a verbatim Google search. Previously PRODded but article's creator unPRODded it. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC) Drprinceton (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton

Dr. Adoni is the figure behind HelixQ. His 30Mod Prime theory in 1995 is now known to be th fastest Prime Algorithm due to bench mark tests in PyPrimes. Wiki Needs a page on Dr. Adoni, HelixQ and his 8 Prime Spirals. So far one Russian is trying to keep the info off of Wiki, and he is not qualified to judge such major new prime work. The 30Mod Prime algorithm predates the sieve of Atkin a 60Mod prime theory also discussed by Dr. Adoni years before and his 90Mod work is relevant as well.

Drprinceton (talk) 19:25, 26 August 2014 (UTC)drprinceton
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  19:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Can you identify any independent reliable sources that will support all the claims you are making for this software or for the theory? —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:GNG. See also Articles for deletion/Dr sol adoni on the WP:FRINGE researcher behind this, and 8 prime spirals for another piece of delete-worthy cruft from the same source. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.