Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell's Bell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 03:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Hell's Bell
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable "e-novel", I was considering db-web-ing it, but I wasn't sure if it qualified, so went with the safe option. Might as well give the author some time to improve the article. Closedmouth (talk) 12:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree with Closedmouth. I can't find any sources that would qualify, per WP:BK.--OliverTwisted (talk) 13:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable - no sources or claim of notability. Springnuts (talk) 13:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- YOWUZA Talk 2 me! 13:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete': Does not show notability per WP:BK. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 14:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as G11 - spam. Half the article is about the author rather than the book. It just a run-of-the-mill selfpublication. No impressive sales record either. - Mgm|(talk) 16:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - As I have been saying for a couple of days, there is little to support the inclusion of this in Wikipedia. Google hits are almost nil. ttonyb1 (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.