Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell Gate (website)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:22, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Hell Gate (website)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to be too soon. Fails WP:GNG, no significant secondary independent in-depth coverage. Also, notability is not inherited, so provenance of founders doesn’t affect decision. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Websites,  and New York. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hmm. But Isn't it good to have this started rather than wait and dump everything all at once? I mean they've been reposted by NY Post and got their reporting has def made a tangible difference. Ketlag (talk) 20:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Isn't it good to have this started rather than wait and dump everything all at once? No, that's what draftspace and user sandboxes are for. I mean they've been reposted by NY Post... First of all, this isn't mentioned or referenced in the article currently; second, the New York Post is not a reliable source (WP:NYPOST). Hatman31 (talk) 21:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Got it. Thanks. Ketlag (talk) 16:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree that this falls under WP:TOOSOON and that it does not meet GNG; all of the references in the article are just from the site itself, and the mentions by the Post which Ketlag brought up (here and here, I think; correct me if I missed something) don't come close to being WP:SIGCOV. Hatman31 (talk) 23:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete as not meeting the WP:GNG due to a lack of references. Maybe WP:TOOSOON applies and it could be re-created should the site gain coverage. Jontesta (talk) 01:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok copy. Thanks for clarifying y'all. Ketlag (talk) 16:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.