Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell Hath No Fury (Charmed Episode)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep (nomination withdrawn). howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 18:15, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Hell Hath No Fury (Charmed Episode)
Article is short and provides no information about the espisode, Banana04131 02:15, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Week Keep as rewritten by Ifnord --Banana04131 01:11, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - I was going to say give it time, but it was written in June 2005, and has only ever had 1 edit, so I think its safe to assume nobody is going to expand on it to make it useful. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 02:58, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. If it has been five months without anyone adding even the most basic info about the episode's plot, then there's not much chance this article will ever be needed. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 12:00, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as rewritten by User:Ifnord. What, does it really take five months of total inactivity and an AfD nomination to get a TV show episode article into at least a half-way decent state? &mdash; J I P  | Talk 17:07, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Imagine my disgust to see episodes of Pokemon survive AfD. It seems that consensus is to keep episodes. So, when I stumbled across this, I rewrote it into a stub. Maybe now it has a fighting chance. Ifnord 16:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the rewrite. - Mgm|(talk) 10:37, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as rewritten, good job Ifnord. To Zordrac and Jip: it wasn't categorized and wasn't marked as a stub. It's easy for an article like that to get lost. - Bobet 16:00, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.