Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell Is a Door to the Sun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rwake. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric  05:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Hell Is a Door to the Sun

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable Jennica ✿ / talk 10:44, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 10:59, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I found an AllMusic review and will add it to the article.--Jennica ✿ / talk 09:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete no claim of notability; an AllMusic review is not sufficient. Power~enwiki (talk) 06:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to band: One review is not enough and I can't find anymore. SL93 (talk) 02:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree that a single review does not rate as significant qualification for a stand alone article. Also, the article for the band Rwake should be considered for Afd, owing to sources being the band's own publicity and social media.ShelbyMarion (talk) 15:30, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Their other albums, notably Voices of Omens, got more reviews, so the band is probably notable even if the main article is poor. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep, delete or redirect to Rwake? Remember that redirects can be created even if the target might be deleted in the future, since the redirect would then just be deleted as well.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect Lack of reviews online so probably not notable, although later albums did get more press; there may be offline reviews but the article is so short that replacing it with a redirect wouldn't be much of a loss, and if more references were found it could easily be recreated. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect I see no argument against a redirect; I've struck my delete vote. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.