Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hellier (documentary series) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 11:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Hellier (documentary series)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The last AFD was closed for procedural reasons, but it isn't any more notable now than it was previously. The main "sources" that were identified in the previous review are Richmond Register and  Vice, which both are derived from press releases without significant original content, and these two obscure non-RS websites which have reviewed it. Does not meet WP:NFILM, WP:GNG, or anything else. The content is based on junk sources and needs to be scrapped. buidhe 05:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. buidhe 05:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 05:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Here is a copy of the last discussion:


 * TheMemeMonarch (talk) 06:48, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Theoretically, SKCRIT applies to suggestions that a page be redirected as well, but I will leave that to another potential closer. Either way, to answer 's question, the logic behind WP:SKCRIT is to prevent AFD from having discussions where everyone agrees the content should be kept. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 17:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment, sorry, but why was the 1st afd closed early ie. which point of WP:SKCRIT? Coolabahapple (talk) 07:21, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , Because I said Merge when I meant Redirect. If nominator argues for merge than it can be procedurally closed, as it was. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 07:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * thanks. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, Coolabahapple, but what Buidhe said is not confirmed. If MJL could comment, that would clear up any misunderstands as to why the first AFD discussion was closed.TheMemeMonarch (talk) 07:36, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the ping. I closed the last AFD for procedural reasons as was mentioned. The logic behind it was suggested it be merged with another article, and AFD is generally not supposed to be used to suggest mergers (see WP:MERGE). When that happens, generally the result is either keep or merge per speedy keep (example).

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. As just a commentator, I don't see how the Vice and Richmond Register sources are at all based from Press Releases. They seem pretty significant to me, and both give every indication that they're original reporting. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 17:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I disagree that the richmond and vice articles are merely based on press releases. Also here is another article. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 18:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep There are lots of reviews and articles, plus this show is connected to the streaming giant Prime Video. TheMemeMonarch (talk) 21:24, 14 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.