Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hellmatic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Hellmatic

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:NM; non-notable unreleased album with lack of substantial coverage from third-party reliable sources. Diverse Mentality  17:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * This is an album which was unreleased but leaked onto the internet so there are no official sources available, this therefore should exclude the article from needing sources, also it never will be released so there probably won't ever be any official sources. Thankyou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel.crawford (talk • contribs) 17:18, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no article about an album is excused the need for references, otherwise i'd put all my one-copy CD-R ones up here. If this album ever gets a release it will generate reviews etc which may justify an article. Perhaps as a bootleg it may be a source of notable speculation similar to Prince's black album - but it will still need reliable sources of information. Until then, delete this. Totnesmartin (talk) 21:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources claiming such information in the article. If it is unreleased, it would be mentioned by Nas himself or a close associate. None of that is present, just links to download it. -- Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. I can confirm this is an official online release from myself. Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasir Nas Jones (talk • contribs) 14:24, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * So confirm it. Point to an interview or press statement confirming this release. Just saying so here isn't enough. Totnesmartin (talk) 14:37, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. I mention it in this interview http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=F0w3LL5bZhE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasir Nas Jones (talk • contribs) 15:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've watched that interview twice, it seems to be all about the Untitled Nas album with no mention of another album. Totnesmartin (talk) 15:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete. Sorry I gave the wrong link http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=tvty4CaEHHU —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasir Nas Jones (talk • contribs) 16:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * YouTube is not a reliable source. MuZemike  ( talk ) 02:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note — I have struck the previous three instances of "Don't Delete." Nasir Nas Jones, this is not a vote, but a discussion, so attempts at votestacking is useless. Your repeated iterations of "Don't Delete" give you the impression of votestacking. MuZemike  ( talk ) 02:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - No WP:RS of this "unreleased" album to even verify the Track listing ... simply fancruft ... should have been CSD A9. Happy Editing! &mdash;  19:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator due to the verifiability issues. JBsupreme (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete since there are serious verifiability problems here, helped of course by the idea that it's not for sale. Drmies (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.