Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello India

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article was previously deleted (under a different name -- Helloo India, which actually appears to be the correct name) via Prod. This article is about a movie for which production apparently started back in 2008, but which was never released; furthermore, there is no evidence that there is actually intent to ever finish/release the movie. Until reliable sources exist that demonstrate that this film has a definite release, the article should be deleted per WP:NFF and WP:N. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable sourcing available. Fails WP:NFF as the nominator suggested. So until there is firm evidence that the film shall be released (WP:CRYSTAL should apply on this matter too) and is notable, its independent article should not be created. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 02:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Early title:


 * Delete until finally released (if ever). We DO have multiple sources speaking about filmmaker/actress Shabnam Kapoor's creation and filming of the project, and had there been an article on her, a merge and redirect would have been well worth consideration. But as there is no suitable redirect target, and as the film seems to be caught up in post-production hell, a delete per WP:Not Yet (films) is in order.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:51, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Largely per MichaelQSchmidt. Lord Roem (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.