Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello Jadoo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SOFTDELETE j⚛e deckertalk 19:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jadoo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The current version of the page is an unsourced stub. I tried to find reliable sources, but couldn't find anything that could expand it beyond a stub. (Basically just verification that it exists.) Unless somebody can prove that RS exists for this that can state something beyond it exists and is popular in its territory, it should be deleted. Luthien22 (talk) 00:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Luthien22 (talk) 00:52, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Luthien22 (talk) 00:52, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  01:51, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment -I'm not sure why it was sorted under WikiProject India. It is a Korean animated series as the first line of article suggests, therefore sources are supposed to exist in theirs language. However, I was able to find three sources on Google News and have added on there (to me it appears to be a notable thing at first glance). Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  01:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (comms)  @ 20:25, 3 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.