Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello My Name Is Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 02:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello My Name Is Records

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

"The label remains in its early stages of development, continuing to progress at a steady pace.". Which means they're not notable yet, and they have the MySpace sourcing to prove it. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only Google hit is their website.  Fails WP:N.  Un  sch  ool  05:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No association with notable musicians or notable albums. Does not satisfy WP:CORP, since An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Article does not include that kind of sourcing. EdJohnston (talk) 05:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, no significant coverage. Dayewalker (talk) 05:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete completely satisfies a lack of notability per WP:CORP.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 05:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet WP:RS and WP:CORP standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello, I'm still learning how to properly post on wikipedia and look forward to adding valuable content to the site. On the subject of Hello My Name Is Records, the page was setup as a follow-up to a handful of links where the label is partnered with other notable companies.  They are the new owner of Fiddler Records, who launched the careers of several notable artists.  In addition, the first release from this label is the solo work from a notable producer of several National Artists.  I hope this helps validate the page and the company.  Please let me know if any other information is needed, or if anything needs to be edited or deleted to make it comply with Wikipedia policy Thank You.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmni (talk • contribs) 07:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED, even if any of the creator's claims were verifiable. No third-party sources establishing any sort of notability. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 17:32, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. In fact, it probably should've been speedy deleted. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 09:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.