Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello in different laguages


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 00:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello in different laguages

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, including a language dictionary. This content might be more suitable for Wikiversity, since it appears to be written as a guide, which is not the tone we strive for on Wikipedia. The references are all pretty much just Google Translate, which is not sufficient for providing the nuance/accuracy of a more reliable source. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:01, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Strong and speedy delete This is not an encyclopaedia article and it never could be one. We already have an article for Hello and the Wiktionary entry for Hello covers a large number of translations in good detail too. Also, we are not taking linguistic advice from people who can't spell "languages" correctly. :-p --DanielRigal (talk) 23:07, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Out of scope for an encyclopedia.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 23:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions because misery loves company. DanielRigal (talk) 23:21, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as out of scope and non encyclopediic conten since Wikipedia is not dictionary and doesn't teach people meanings in various languages. –Ammarpad (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a phrasebook and, as DanielRigal noted, we already have articles that cover most of what the author is trying to say. RA 0808  talkcontribs 01:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Granted, I like this and think it is cool, but this is out of scope for us.  Seems to fall afoul of WP:LIST, and we're really not a linguistic resource to quite this regard. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 04:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, that's what Wiktionary is for. Graham 87 05:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 10:24, 2 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary nor a foreign translator. Ajf773 (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Notable topic, but inappropriate. w umbolo   ^^^  19:22, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Adios and sayonara, but hopefully not auf Wiedersehen or au revoir. Il neige (it's snowing). Clarityfiend (talk) 07:49, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Tchuss, ja. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  21:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This is not a topic of encyclopedia. --Yeoncong323 (talk) 00:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete While it sounds interesting, I do not think it belongs on Wikipedia. Expertwikiguy (talk) 17:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Hasta La Vista, Baby! - wikipedia is not a place for lists of words. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.