Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Help (2021 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Help (2021 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:NFILM - the only coverage is in paid for spam sources and isn't otherwise notable  CUPIDICAE💕  12:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep There are now more sources being added to page, these are not paid for spam sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brslxyl (talk • contribs) 14:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * And what sources would those be that cover this film in depth? CUPIDICAE💕  14:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see the page for the sources that's been added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brslxyl (talk • contribs) 14:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep There are several reviews cited in the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as has reliable sources coverage in the article including reviews in Starburst and Film Threat which are reliable sources for films, passes WP:GNG imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. As a side note, this is not an endorsement to keep any of the actors or other persons involved in this film. Bearian (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Thanks Bubbly Snow   &#x1F4AC; 17:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * See WP:JUSTAVOTE. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Filmhounds, Film Threat and Starburt reviews appear to be decent enough sources to pass WP:GNG. Nsk92 (talk) 19:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.