Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helping Brainz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus herein is for deletion. North America1000 10:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Helping Brainz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is written by a COI editor, and there is no notability to their organisation. The sources are weak, when I actually wrote what the sources say I managed about 3 lines of text, although this editor then removed the only well-written part of the article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  21:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Looks like everything out there that could serve as a source is social media or self-generated. Thoroughly fails WP:ORG. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

--Yedhukrishna Menon 21:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Hi My name is Yedhukrishna Menon, fortunately the founder of Helping Brainz, which have been nominated for deletion. Helping Brainz is a non profit making organization based in Delhi which works for the underpriviledged on the weekends, since the members of the organization are working professionals. we never work/worked to bear fruits, so nothing fancy to boast about as well. Helping Brainz is all about a passion which young Indians wants to spread (spreading here doesn't mean publicity) throughout the world so that the world one day can become a store house of self-less workers. Few days back to invite more human beings to this ideology, I thought of creating a Wikipedia page, where I plan to include some short and crisp information, just to motivate the youth to work for the community. Now it's Wikipedia's decision to delete it or not. I will continue my community service even without the Wikipedia Page. Everything happens for good. Thank you--Yedhukrishna Menon 21:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

And nothing is SOCIAL MEDIA SELF GENERATED--Yedhukrishna Menon 21:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yedhukrishnamenon (talk • contribs)

Also to add on : as mentioned by he helped me editing the same however, for instance what he cited in the page is "Delhi University conducted "Udaan", and which is wrong, so re-entered the information as "Helping Brainz in association with AIESEC in Delhi University conducted "Udaan", and because of which he mentioned that the 'COI' user deleted the information entered by the administrator.
 * My complaint is that the information I added was correct, because I used the sources. Instead of using the sources, you were just saying whatever. But apparently your whatever is better. But this definitely fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO - I was trying to see it's notability, was never convinced it was very notable. Also, stop pinging me everytime you write something, and stop posting on my talkpage, it won't change my opinion. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I dont agree with you Joseph. The sentence framed by you had different meanings, don't know what you read in the sources. I conducted the event so I know it better, so thank you. Please go ahead and do whatever you want with my page. Won't disturb you!--Yedhukrishna Menon 21:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yedhukrishnamenon (talk • contribs)
 * Delete I would already have speedy deleted it except that a speedy was previously declined, by in order to let the contributor have a chance to improve it. That decline was not wrong, but it prevents a speedy now. I think this is absolutely hopeless promotionalism, and a SNOW delete would be in order.  DGG ( talk ) 00:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree, it would be speedy deletable if I hadn't previously removed it. My reason for removing it was that it seemed like the editor was heading in the right direction, removing some of the promotional stuff. But I was never convinced by the notability, and this still reads super-promotional. At least by doing this AfD it can never be created again, as it will fail WP:CSD. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, it can be if it suddenly meets WP:ORG, which does happen sometimes because it was too soon. § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as multiple searches failed to find even one significant source and I don't see any hope for the article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Glad people agree with me. Joseph2302 (talk) 02:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.