Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemi Ahio (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 09:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Hemi Ahio
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX. The Db-repost was declined per the discussion on the articles talk page but the notability criteria for boxers is still far from being met. Worth reading the talk page and the previous AfD from last October.Peter Rehse (talk) 21:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete I made this in the passed, Boxer not notable yet following WP:NBOX. However I think the boxer will be close in the future within next year or two, Boxer is definitely qualified to fight for a regional title but of course needs to fight for one to get notable on here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennyaha (talk • contribs) 00:29, 17 June 2016‎ (UTC)
 * Keep He's a top prospect and plenty of readers want to know information about him, so why not have a page for this young boxer? He has been given the credibility that he deserves for his career with a simple and in depth written article that comes along with references and proof. He's won a regional title and is ranked in the top 100's by many websites and one sanctioning body that we know of, there could be more with other sanctioning bodies that we don't know of. If the other bodies showed their top 100 rankings this would be helpful for proof but unfortunately that's hard to find so the IBO is the closest we've got. He's notable, but just maybe not on a world scale, but defiantly in New Zealand. Other than the notability, this article is well sourced and written. At least it meets requirements unlike some articles about "notable" boxers. Those should be deleted before this is even thought of. Users need to understand he's notable no matter what, whether it's big or small, notable is notable. He's got a regional title and is being ranked in top 100's, and if that's not near notable enough, I don't know what is.Kidsoljah (talk) 03:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * He has not won a regional title, he has won a National title. Trust me when I say this I do want this article up there and I am for this article to happen, but unfortunately according WP:NBOX he isnt notable. Like I said before I have made this article in the passed but was deleted and rightfully so. Plus a IBO Ranking is not a notable ranking since they use Boxrec as their rankings. And even if IBO does become a notable ranking it would need to be in the top 15 not top 100. --Bennyaha (talk) 08:17, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Article was created WP:TOOSOON. Not yet notable enough as a boxer and routine sports reporting is not enough to meet WP:GNG. The keep arguments are not valid WP arguments (why not?, lots of people want to read about him, and being a prospect shows he's not yet arrived).Mdtemp (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't appear to yet be a notable boxer. More importantly, WP:GNG is not met because the references consist of routine sports reporting like fight announcements and results.  I agree with the TOOSOON comment and that the reasons put forth for keeping the article are not good ones for WP. Papaursa (talk) 23:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.