Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henderson Village (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This survived in 2012, but the community is more skeptical about the independence and significance of WP:NORG coverage now, and two relists have not produced convincing sources. RL0919 (talk) 06:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Henderson Village
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This tourist hotel appears to have gone out of business in 2014, the property was purchased and converted to a wedding venue under a different name and different management. See and. As a local wedding venue it almost definitely wouldn't merit an article, and almost zero of the current material would survive, except maybe a few numbers. See no reason to keep this, if the wedding venue has notability someone can recreate it. Krelnik (talk) 01:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment As Wikipedia is not a directory, it is irrelevant whether the resort is currently in business or not - what matters is whether it was notable when it was. I do find coverage (articles) in Newspapers.com, both within Georgia and in other states, and those articles mention other articles in magazines (which are not online), and also some awards. If the article is retained, it should be updated with that information and those references, and the date it closed. RebeccaGreen (talk) 09:50, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I did look in Newspapers.com myself WP:BEFORE nominating this. I would note that "Henderson Village" matches a number of other things that are not this business. When you go outside Georgia, you get even more false matches - a town in Illinois, a place in Florida and something in North Carolina, none of which relate to this. As an example, there was an unrelated mixed-use development in Alpharetta, Georgia that used this name. When you filter out all those false matches, what I find is a fairly trivial amount of coverage - hotel reviews, travel guides and the like. This is sort of thing that any business might garner, I don't see how it confers notability, but I do confess I've never worked on an article about a hotel or tourist site before so I'm not super-familiar with the notability rules here. --Krelnik (talk) 14:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 01:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Doesn't look to satisfy WP:NORG. Perhaps even more importantly, it doesn't look like any of the sources used are up to snuff according to that guideline, either, so there would be no material to retain. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 06:51, 20 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.