Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hendley Associates (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Deleted as G12. Non admin closure. Rockfang (talk) 04:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Hendley Associates
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Whole sections are either poorly paraphrased or copied directly from The Teeth of the Tiger. Nolookingca (talk) 23:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete In universe plot summary. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as a copyright violation. Most of the text of this article is copied directly from the novel. Even ignoring that, there's absolutely no contextualization in this article - it's a purely in-universe description of a non-notable plot element. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 00:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: agreed. I didn't have the book on hand at the time of the original nomination, and didn't realize how much of was done word-for-word. Nolookingca (T | C) 02:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Google Books is an excellent tool for finding copyvios from books. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 03:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per copyvio. No evidence that this is notable outside the world of the novel. Doesn't need its own article.  Graymornings (talk) 03:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.