Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hendrickson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. --Coredesat talk 05:33, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Hendrickson
nonnotable company NawlinWiki 21:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Withdrawing nomination, good enough for me, Ziggurat, thanks! NawlinWiki 00:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete per nom. One of the largest suppliers of truck suspensions - but no assertion of notability outside that limited field. Tevildo 21:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep following updates. Tevildo 07:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable company within their industry. Probably significantly larger than many software-makers that are in Wikipedia. Fan1967 21:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Should therefore be kept if references are added to show it makes WP:CORP. If that's not done, though, the _article_ won't qualify, even if the _corporation_ does. Tevildo 21:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep if verified: we've got plenty of semi-obscure computer and video game related companies, but if we can get verifiable information to show they're significant, they're worth keeping. Someone dig up some trade mags or something. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 21:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I've rewritten and added some prelim sources; many more are available through Google Books. Once again, nn . Z iggurat 21:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Seems notable enough but I'm not familiar with truck part myself.--Nick Y. 00:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.