Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hendry Antonay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Hendry Antonay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD contested by article creator. Player is yet to play in a fully-professional league) (confirmed by this, so fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also no significant coverage, so fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 09:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Delete as per nom. Hughesdarren (talk) 09:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Could find some coverage and there will be more in the  Indian reginal language  media.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * FIFA U-17 World Cup: Indian Stars Sanjeev Stalin and Hendry Antonay Make Quiet Return to Bengaluru  90Min
 * Sharing a common passion: Meet the two Bengaluru boys in India's FIFA under U- 17 World Cup squad Newminute
 * Two from city in Indian team Deccan Herald
 * Opportunity knocks twice for Hendry Antonay The Times of India
 * U-17 WC: Families rejoice as defensive duo makes cut Sportsstar
 * Fifa U-17 World Cup: Hendry Antonay’s story is one of surviving odds and second chances Scroll
 * Keep - per above for GNG, just enough out there - esp., . I'll add too. The hosting of the 2017 FIFA U-17 World Cup was a rather big event in Indian football, so any coverage from that isn't routine or anything of the sort in my opinion. Pinging Pharaoh of the Wizards, who I'm assuming forgot to leave an actual 'vote'. R96Skinner (talk) 01:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comments above passes WP:GNG through does not meet WP:NFOOTY at this point as the subject has not made yet made his debut for Chennaiyin FC.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --BlameRuiner (talk) 05:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep meets GNG per links from POTW and R96 above (esp. ). (It happened again!) – Levivich  05:15, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * What happened again? GiantSnowman 08:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , R96 and I agreed on an AfD. – Levivich 16:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Frightening! :D R96Skinner (talk) 16:29, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Very scary!


 * I'm happy to withdraw based on GNG pass thanks to sources now located if wants to amend their vote? GiantSnowman 12:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No I'll stay by my vote as I still don't a significant coverage. Although it's clear that there's no consensus to delete anyway. --BlameRuiner (talk) 12:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep overwhelming evidence of GNG significant coverage in various sources posted above. I'm perplexed on today's claims that there's no significant coverage, with no explanation on how in-depth articles don't count. Nfitz (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Nothing to be perplexed about. The sources were only located after the AFD was started. GiantSnowman 18:08, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It was the today's claim by User:BlameRuiner that perplexed me, rather than the original and earlier comments. I clarified my post above. Nfitz (talk) 19:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Almost all sources just repeat the same information about two local boys that got selected for U17 NT and everyone happy for them (and our boy Hendry didn't even play a single minute). I didn't see any in-depth coverage that justifies GNG. --BlameRuiner (talk) 19:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd hardly call The Times of India 'local'. It's the biggest English newspaper on the planet, and certainly not local. Or The Hindu which must be close to be number 2 in the world - though I suppose it could be described as local ... but it's hardly a local story. Is The Sporting News also local - Sporting News is based in North Carolina. Nfitz (talk) 20:20, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.