Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henleaze Infant and Junior School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 00:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Henleaze Infant and Junior School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable primary school. No notability asserted, or found. Crazysuit 23:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   —Camaron1 | Chris 09:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 *  Keep Comment - Both schools combined do have at least some notability. The Infants school oversubscription got news coverage that could be put into the article . Also, the Junior School got a good report and was marked as "best of the best" by Ofsted . Camaron1 | Chris 14:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, Schools are not notable because they've been in a local paper. ~Jeeny (talk) 03:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It is regional, but BBC News is not a local paper. Camaron1 | Chris 11:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not notable in the least, nor is there any assertion of notability. Per Jeeny's comment above, local (newspaper) notability isn't that special. - Rjd0060 04:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per "wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of yellow pages". --victor falk 09:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete since Wikipedia is not a directory. CRGreathouse (t | c) 20:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 *  Note: WikiProject Bristol has been informed of this discussion. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with article on Henleaze. Dahliarose 11:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I considered suggesting that earlier, the amount of sources on this school might not be enough to justify a standalone page so it can simply merged like Liss Junior School. Though I do disagree (as suggested generally in this AFD) for any article that the current state of the article only applies when looking at notability, review the essay WP:POTENTIAL. Camaron1 | Chris 19:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If it's really notable, there would be more than zero references. &mdash;ScouterSig 15:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability.JodyBRoll, Tide, Roll 16:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - no assertion of notability, no reliabe sources as references. --Rocksanddirt 17:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Henleaze, Bristol. Is there any valid reason not to?   Bur nt sau ce  18:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Henleaze, Bristol. Is there any valid reason not to?   Bur nt sau ce  18:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.