Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henri Ben Ezra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 10:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Henri Ben Ezra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No authentic evidence of notability. References are more or less press releases which talk about the product developed by the subject rather than the subject itself. Fails at WP:GNG. Hitro talk 10:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Person who has developed a notable software platform. Needs expansion, not deletion.--Geewhiz (talk) 11:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTINHERITED may apply here. Hitro talk 14:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. I did a quick search and found many more potential references. I used the two most reputable ones The Daily Telegraph and the Jerusalem Post (https://www.jpost.com/Jpost-Tech/Business-and-Innovation/How-an-Israeli-tech-company-helped-enable-the-global-chatbot-revolution-556553) to add a section on his vision. For me the Jerusalem Post is a clincher: that article claims he may be remembered as introducing one of the seven Israeli discoveries to influence the world. JimHolden (talk) 11:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Added another reputable source that believes his views are noteworthy (Archival Outlook). JimHolden (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.