Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henriett Koósz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 19:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Henriett Koósz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see where this person passes GNG notability. Maybe a 15 minute of fame bio, but mostly just passing mentions in articles. Certainly does not meet Olympic Project Guidelines or Tennis Project Guidelines or WP:NSPORT. No gold medals either. There's been a rash of these bios created lately. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable sportsperson.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I found a number of articles about her in German, and while I admittedly don't speak German, rough English translations (not to mention the amount of coverage that came up from an English-language search engine) suggest that she meets the GNG.       TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 02:12, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Not at all convinced with those sources. 1. I'm not sure what this is. It's in a piece called Blogging World of Women and pairs up 6 different ladies from different walks of life. 2. is a bio by the Paralympic committee, like they do with most athletes. 3. is simply a match description. 4. is actually a real piece that is the first we've seen that is even remotely good. 5. Just a passing mention. 6. is just a score. 7. is just a score. Not enough to make her a notable personality to me. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:GNG particularly considering the context. Article could use expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 02:35, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know what is meant by "context" since GNG could care less about context, but I don't see it. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:23, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:47, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per my review of the sources listed above. The subject easily meets BASIC, and in my opinion GNG too. Lourdes  05:34, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This is not enough for GNG. 's analysis of the sources is spot on. Trivial mentions, routine sports coverage (scores) and a directory listing does not help to satisfy GNG. This is literally the only somewhat good coverage I found. Per WP:WHYN, we definitely don't have enough here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.