Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Irgang Elsner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Henrik Irgang Elsner

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is very little coverage of Elsner aside from content which appears to have been created based on this article. The most reputable source I have found is an interview with Elsner about the Danish Gin industry. Does not appear to meet coverage required by WP:BIO. Uffda608 (talk) 17:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Denmark. Uffda608 (talk) 17:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 5.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:50, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are a few reasonably well cited papers in GScholar (cited as "Henrik Elsner" ), but not enough to satisfy WP:PROF. Nothing else to indicate passing WP:PROF on other grounds. Nsk92 (talk) 14:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Nsk92 (talk) 14:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. Citation profile appears respectable, with top citns in GS 178,139,97 and a few other moderately cited papers, but top paper has nine co-authors; I don't think this is quite enough to meet WP:PROF in a fairly highly cited field. Also, if the name were not fairly unusual, I'd say the well-cited papers I'm seeing were not by the subject; they're all biology/biophysics, not chemistry; the article is sufficiently microstubby that it is impossible to tell. Nothing obvious in Ebsco/Proquest. Article appears to have been created by SPA with no substantive edits by others. Leaning delete unless anyone can come up with anything better; I don't think the current article is much loss. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * delete. I dont see a pass of WP:NPROF here nor GNG. The main source of the article is a wine-magazine, there really isnt much to write about at this point. --hroest 03:42, 8 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. I did some investigation and did not find additional supporting material - which doesn't mean it doesn't exist, of course.  I'm thinking that there might be significant Danish-local sources, which could support an article on the Danish Wikipedia, but those wouldn't be generally available globally, I think. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.