Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Karlsson (musicologist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 21:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Henrik Karlsson (musicologist)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:NCREATIVE. Clear friend  a  💬  22:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Bands and musicians,  and Sweden.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Probably meets WP:AUTHOR, I easily found several reviews of his 2013 book. Quickly added them, though several are paywalled. Geschichte (talk) 09:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'd like to see more than one book for WP:AUTHOR but Royal Swedish Academy of Music might be a pass of WP:PROF. It depends on whether it is for music scholarship (likely in his case) or performance (also prestigious but not really academic notability). —David Eppstein (talk) 17:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Also ping as our in-house music scholarship expert. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep -- my sense is that the membership in Royal Swedish Academy of Music would be a WP:PROF qualification (membership in a very rigorously chosen and prestigious academic society). There are four academics (or five if the society director is included) in the list of 177 current members, among 800ish since the founding in the 1770s, suggesting that at least one society considers him among the top handful of music academics in Sweden.  I don't personally know his work, but I haven't really studied Swedish music history, which is his specialty.  But he is the author of the plurality(? majority?) of the articles on Swedish music in the New Grove 2001 encyclopedia, meaning he had enough reputation by then to be a significant authority.  I think that to the extent that the Academy does appoint researchers as members, it is in that capacity an academic institution; the American Academy of Arts and Sciences appoints some non-academic musicians and screen actors as well, but its appointments of academics are considered as WP:PROF#C3.  (I was convinced of a Keep before I looked at WP's coverage of Swedish academics in music.  A delete here would be 20% of the living people in the category).  -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 07:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * (And thanks for the Ping !) -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 07:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep it certainly seems that NACADEMIC is met. Niafied (talk) 04:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.