Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Wergelands gate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Henrik Wergelands gate

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable street. Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:GEOROAD. Was de-prodded without explanation. Nothing in the article to suggest why this particular street is notable.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 00:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. This article is one of a dozen or so on streets in Kristiansand by the same creator, originally each with two "references" to maps.google.com and the Kristiansand tourist office website, neither of which mention the street; now each referenced with a single Google maps link to prove that the streets actually exist. Can't find anything remarkable about this street online in English or Norwegian. This would probably be an acceptable entry for Wikitravel, but Wikipedia is not a travel guide, nor a gazeteer, and this is not the place for a stub article on each street in the centre of Kristiansand. There is also significant overlap between the contributions of the creator of this article and those of another editor, whose user talk page is also full of prods and a plea to stop creating stubs on non-notable places in Kristiansand. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not independently notable. SwisterTwister   talk  19:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.