Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry F. Hewes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:18, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Henry F. Hewes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sees to fail WP:POLITICIAN to me, unremarkable worker on the stokehold.TheLongTone (talk) 16:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC) TheLongTone (talk) 16:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. APerson (talk!) 17:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. APerson (talk!) 17:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. APerson (talk!) 17:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'm just not seeing a strong claim to passing WP:NPOL here. A person does not get a Wikipedia article just for being an unelected candidate for political office — if you cannot provide credible and properly sourced evidence that a person already passed a Wikipedia inclusion guideline for some other reason before running in an election, then they have to win the election, not just have their name on a ballot, to clear the inclusion bar. And for referencing, I see a lot of primary sourcing and passing namechecks of his existence, with just one article ("Right to Life Candidate Sees Moral Ills") that actually has him as its substantive subject — but one article does not make for a WP:GNG pass either. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 04:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I will gather more secondary sources to add to the entry. I understand the parameters for a a WP:GNG Towernyc2003 (talk) 05:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable unless he actually wins an office. Other coverage fails GNG (in passing, niche/local, etc.). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.