Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry F. Pulitzer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Isleworth Mona Lisa. Anything important can be merged from the history.  Sandstein  22:08, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Henry F. Pulitzer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notable sources. Unaddressed problems, especially COI. Fails standard BIO rules. DreamGuy (talk) 18:33, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No images, isn't very notable and barely any content.
 * Comment "No images"(?) and "barely an content" are not criteria for deletion. As for "isn't very notable": how so?  freshacconci  talk to me  19:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment For the other part, that was speedy deletion. I apologize, sometimes I get brain farts. Anyways, Notability (people) says that The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times. Or that: The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. There, I don't see either. Also, it needs more significant coverage in WP:reliable sources. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 10:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - So he was the owner of the Mona Lisa, eh? Ummmm, maybe, I suppose, but I doubt it. I deleted that line and am perfectly fine with making this entire piece go away. Carrite (talk) 01:46, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hold on Please slow down and read carefully. Pulitzer was the owner of the Isleworth Mona Lisa.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I have no idea whether the Isleworth Mona Lisa is authentic. I am saying Keep because Pulitzer is a central part of l'affaire de Isleworth, the link is useful to that page, and - especially - because the amount of attention attracted by the involvement of Pulitzer was and continues to be enormous. See .. and the rest of what's on news searches.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Isleworth Mona Lisa. His media coverage seems to rest solely on his ownership and championship of the painting. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete possibly re-direct to Isleworth Mona Lisa, but there's nothing here that would be inappropriate there, and the story is all about the painting, not this person. For him to have a page there would need to be content about him, and there isn't. I say "possibly" redirect because he is found with a text search, and that is enough IMO. LaMona (talk) 16:24, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia:Notability (people) says that The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times. Or that: The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. There, I don't see either. Also, it needs more significant coverage in WP:reliable sources. Dat GuyWiki (talk) 17:05, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:23, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Isleworth Mona Lisa -- RoySmith (talk) 18:54, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.