Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Gage (16th-century landowner)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Henry Gage (16th-century landowner)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I came across this one while closing Articles for deletion/George Gage (16th-century landowner). Same reasons, no nontrivial coverage in secondary sources, also WP:NOTMEMORIAL andWP:NOTGENEALOGY. I am also nominating the following related pages, which suffer from the same issues. Some of the articles have a Career section, but those again only list trivial mentions from other sources.


 * Tone 07:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Tone 07:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete all Wikipedia is not a genealogical database. We do not keep articles on people who never did anything substantial and never received substantial coverage for their actions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:12, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I make this vote with some regret as the articles are all as well researched as can be expected for fairly minor gentry of this period. They are all rather more than mere genealogy, but the subjects are all completely NN.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.