Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry James Houghton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Surveyor General of Western Australia. Complex / Rational 14:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Henry James Houghton

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested prod. Zero in-depth coverage from independent, secondary, reliable sources. Current sourcing is only a government publication and a database. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 08:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Surveyor General of Western Australia as ATD for the time being. We have articles on other holders of this post so it is possible that this article could be restored and expanded in the future. Mccapra (talk) 12:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Geography,  and Australia. Skynxnex (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete This article lacks significant sources needed to establish notability. Several of the other articles on holders of this post were also just recently created by the same person, and these similarly lack GNG-compliant sourcing, so their existence is no basis for maintaining this one. John Sherlock Brooking is sourced to some unreliable/non-substantive genealogy pages and a facebook page. John Percy Camm and others are similar. I would ask the creator to become more familiar with sourcing to reliable and significant coverage before creating any more articles. Reywas92Talk 17:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Mccapra. Deus et lex (talk) 23:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Surveyor General of Western Australia: Article simply fails WP:GNG ––– GMH MELBOURNE   TALK  04:41, 4 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.