Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Liebman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Henry Liebman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability seems questionable... several PR/bizjournal sources, and no obvious claim to notability. &mdash; Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 14:02, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Coffee  //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 14:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Coffee  //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 14:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep for GNG - article contains a 2007 profile story in the Seattle Times in which the Seattle Times, speaking in its own voice, describes Liebman as someone who makes [notable] "... people nervous. City officials, labor leaders, Port commissioners."; Knute Berger writes in 2007 in Crosscut.com that Liebman is a "900 pound gorilla" in commercial real estate  (so he passes the Gorilla Notability Guidelines) ; article includes a 650-word story from 2016 in the Seattle Times  dedicated to Liebman's legal disputes; Liebman received dedicated coverage by NBC News, the Christian Science Monitor , Eugene Register-Guard , and USA Today  in the context of a fish he caught in 2016; Liebman also has a couple incidental mentions in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and Northwest Asian Weekly spanning two different years (a Google News search produces a few more short mentions on NPR and the New York Times); he also has mentions in the Seattle Weekly and Seattle Times about a restaurant naming a menu item after him. While there are PR and WP:PRIMARY sources (e.g. a Bloomberg profile and a SEC filing), they're just used to fill-out vital statistics and not to establish GNG. I agree with Coffee that this is on the line, however, IMO it just crosses the GNG for consistent and in-depth coverage spanning multiple events in WP:RS. Chetsford (talk) 16:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
 * (Full Disclosure: I am the editor who originally created this article. Chetsford (talk) 20:56, 24 February 2018 (UTC))


 * Keep per Chetsford's arguments above, and the considerable non-routine coverage of his activities by The Seattle Times. I can return 43 results since 2000 alone, including front-page (A1) articles like this one.  Sounder Bruce  21:02, 24 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.