Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Lindlahr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for article retention. North America1000 01:19, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Henry Lindlahr

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:BIO. I think it is irresponsible for Wikipedia to have a WP:BLP on this subject since there isn't really much to go on by way of reliable independent sources we would need to write a biography on a naturopath. Ireneshih (talk) 06:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  07:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  07:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  07:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment http://www.worldcat.org/title/nature-doctors-pioneers-in-naturopathic-medicine/oclc/32140457 seems to contain a longer biography. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as Books, News (one apparent Chinese link) and Highbeam all found links but this will certainly have archived information thus familiar attention is needed. I think may have some insight with this especially given the WorldCat link.  SwisterTwister   talk  08:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. notable enough. Does seem to have been a significant author in the field.  DGG ( talk ) 03:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 00:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, per DGG. Martinogk (talk) 03:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.