Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Loucks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star  Mississippi  02:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Henry Loucks

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Biography of a politician and journalist, whose only stated claim of notability is having been a losing candidate in an election. As always, candidates don't get articles just for being candidates per se, but this makes no other strong claim of notability -- newspaper editors aren't "inherently" notable just for being newspaper editors, and writers of books aren't "inherently" notable just because their books exist, either -- and it's referenced entirely to glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things, with no evidence shown of any references that are actually about him in any non-trivial way. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a stronger notability claim, and better sourcing for it, than this. Bearcat (talk) 13:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Journalism,  and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 13:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: The correct title would be "Henry L. Loucks", as that is the WP:COMMONNAME. Loucks appears to have been a major figure both in early South Dakota politics and in national US politics as the head of the Farmers' Alliance. There are literary sources that provide WP:SIGCOV, namely and ;  is also a good one. Several other literary sources exist just on GBooks. While currently in poor shape, this can be a very good article if given some love. Curbon7 (talk) 19:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable since he has an entry in the American National Biographical Dictionary Piecesofuk (talk) 13:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject has sources that make support for inclusion in Wikipedia. Aside from the standard media coverage. IrishOsita (talk) 03:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.