Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Martin (Irish Gaelic Games writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 01:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Henry Martin (Irish Gaelic Games writer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable Bothpath (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  19:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 20:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No suggestion of notability. Will have to wait until book is out or substantial coverage occurs. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * KeepThe following link clearly backs up the information http://www.limerickleader.ie/kilmallocksouth-east/Author-Henry-to-tell-Limerick39s.5044536.jp —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.203.238.22 (talk) 19:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment. removed the deletion template. I have restored it. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. He does have a link to real press coverage concerning his book. But I don't think one local news story about a book that hasn't yet appeared is enough to pass WP:CREATIVE. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * delete article doesn't mention the writings but title defines him as a writer. No claim to notability is made. Mrathel (talk) 19:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.