Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Otto Brünjes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Randykitty (talk) 15:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Henry Otto Brünjes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: absolutely no claims to notability whatsoever. Delete. Bristolbottom (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep or possibly redirect to Premier Medical Group. I don't think that the use of the word absolutely in the nomination is appropriate, as he was the founder, first CEO and later chairman of the Premier Medical Group. He is also a member of the British Astronomical Society, not that that provides notability. --Bejnar (talk) 07:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)


 * delete and redirect to Premier Medical Group. LibStar (talk) 23:48, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. An article in A & C Black's Who's Who is conclusive proof of notability, like an obituary in the NYT. It satisfies GNG by itself and indicates that other sources are likely to exist, perhaps in print (NRVE). It is very unlikely that the professional biographers of that publication would make a mistake about who is and isn't notable. James500 (talk) 07:37, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * please point to the notability guideline which says "An article in A & C Black's Who's Who is conclusive proof of notability," LibStar (talk) 08:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * It doesn't need to be written down in express words. You won't find an express reference to NYT obituaries in the guidelines, but we all appear to accept they are conclusive proof. James500 (talk) 22:10, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 15:45, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * DELETE Not notable. Some User chose to write a ton of articles about people who went to his fancy school for rich people in England. None of them are notable, but because some "Administrators" and "Senior Editors" love the British Empire they think we have to "open the floodgates" to everybody who got some medal or are in some "Who's Who", but the Wikipedia rules don't say anything about that and according to GNG this article should be deleted. My father is in a Who's Who book, but nobody thinks HE deserves a Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayVenn (talk • contribs) 02:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * (selective) merge and redirect to Premier Medical Group. Not enough stuff (nor notability) to justify a separate article, but it is reasonable to have a mention of him in the article about the company he founded (interisting how Dr Harry Brunjes already redirects to the company's article). There is not too much to merge anyway, except his birth date/place and his studies. Cavarrone 06:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Additional information added so that the article doesn't focus on Premier Medical Group MJT21 (talk) 10:08, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 *  Delete  Fails to show why he's notable, and youtube, and who's who of whatever fail RS. KoshVorlon  Rassekali ternii i mlechnye puti 16:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * No, Who's Who most certainly does not fail RS. The exploitative knock-offs do, but not the original. That's a standard reference work. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The British Who's Who is a particularly reliable source. --Bejnar (talk) 21:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.