Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Piper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Henry Piper

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article seems to be relying on the connection with Henry Piper's much more notable grandparents. This seems to be the only claim of importance and I can't see anything more substantial online. People don't inherit notability. The sources presented here amount to an interview with a video production company, an 18 page gallery publication (authored by the Piper family) and a brief mention of one of his works hanging on someone's wall, in a Telegraph article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. PROD was declined by another editor. Sionk (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: I have added more references and re-arranged the article. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 18:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Even the expanded version has almost no information about the artist, and there is nothing in the little information given to show that he meets the standard for WP:CREATIVE. &#39;DGG (at NYPL)&#39; (talk) 21:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:ARTIST (work in permanent collections of major museums, reviews in national newspapers, etc) —David Eppstein (talk) 22:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.