Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Rothstein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Henry Rothstein

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:PROF. Unreferenced. Reads like a resume. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 22:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 22:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Has 4,000 cites. I don't know how much is the average for this field, but that seems like a substantial number for the purposes of WP:NPROF. Curbon7 (talk) 22:31, 15 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep More than 4000 citations, eight publications with more than 100 cites (and one of them above 1600). Seems enough to claim a relevant influence on his field. Jeppiz (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clear pass of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2023 (UTC).
 * I sent an email to the oversight team just asking for the photograph to be deleted on 15.2.23 on the grounds that it was an intrusive and professionally damaging image of me. I am ok with the text more or less as it stands. 86.171.114.69 (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per PROF-C1 given citation count. -- Mvqr (talk) 12:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per above passes WP:PROF.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.