Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Walsh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —  Scott  •  talk  10:42, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Henry Walsh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Inarguably a non-notable sportsman. The cricketer has not played in any World Cups, and I can't find any reliable sources on Google either that could demonstrate anything significant the sportsman has done as a cricketer. I've seen articles about sportspeople with more assertion of significance than this one getting deleted via AfDs, but this shouldn't be counted per WP:WAX.  smt cha hal  (talk) 10:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, will become notable if her plays senior cricket, but playing at Under-19 level isn't enough on its own.  Harrias  talk 13:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:CRIN and WP:ATH currently; maybe in a few months' time it will be different, but we can only judge on where he's got to now. Johnlp (talk) 22:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per nomination and the above two comments. Can be recreated if and when he plays a major form of cricket. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 16:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 21:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete – per nom &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  11:45, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete – per nom Videomaniac29 (talk) 05:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.