Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heptacontadigon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of polygons. Redirected by (temporarily) blocked article creator, and general consensus here, so no need for further discussion. ansh 666 19:00, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Heptacontadigon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not every form of polygon has an article within Wikipedia and rightfully so given not every polygon is notable. As this article fails to explain what is particularly notable with a 72 sided polygon I can't see why it should have it's own article. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not appear to be notable. The title could possibly be redirected to List of polygons.- MrX 23:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect -Agree With MrX -Rpyle731talk 00:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of polygons. This user has enthusiastically created a number of similar articles, all of which have been redirected to the same target destination. We really don't need an article on every fancy polygonal shape that is mathematically feasible. Where would it stop? Nick Moyes (talk) 01:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect. Not independently notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:30, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect, per above. -- Begoon 11:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of polygons. There just doesn't appear to be much said about 72-gons by themselves. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.