Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heptovigesimal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge and redirect. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Heptovigesimal

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Already covered at Septemvigesimal, we don't need duplicate articles. Redirect to Septemvigesimal. Professor M. Fiendish, Esq. 12:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy merge and redirect The information about natural langauges using this system is only present on the Heptovigesimal page; it should be copied to the Septemvigesimal page, and then Heptovigesimal redirected. This should have been done speedily (remember be bold!) rather than requiring an AfD discussion.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect - but, as neither article has sources, how do we determine which is the correct article name ? Gandalf61 (talk) 14:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Most bases have Latin names, so I think "septemvigesimal" should be correct. Professor M. Fiendish, Esq. 03:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.