Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbabolics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Herbabolics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is not a notable term. A google search turns up essentially nothing. The only reference cited in the article is clearly not a WP:RS. If there is anything to be said about natural alternatives to synthetic anabolic steroids, it can be said at anabolic steroid. ChemNerd (talk) 12:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:14, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a notable term as it does not appear to be in widespread use, as evidenced by the lack of reliable sources. So delete, as per WP:NEO. Drchriswilliams (talk) 14:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I patrolled this at NPP and planned to nominate since all of this is questionably notable for clear notability and improvements, searches noticeably found nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  18:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NEO (which is a new one to me - always more to learn on WP). Edwardx (talk) 21:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.