Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert L. Rosedale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Herbert L. Rosedale

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:BIO. No in-depth coverage found and relatively low number passing references found. Tgeairn (talk) 19:13, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  20:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  20:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:07, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Obits http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=900005396201/Obituary-Herbert-L-Rosedale?slreturn=20140911182649 and http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.1525/nr.2004.7.3.127?uid=3738776&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104892968273 Stuartyeates (talk) 22:28, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established. Eight years after its creation the article is still no more than a stub - just 4 sentences! DaveApter (talk) 10:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:35, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete a lawyer having an obit in a law journal does not confer notability. Nor does contributing to a book - there is no indication what the contribution was. The burden of persuasion is on those who claim notability to show it, they have fallen quite short. Fails WP:GNG. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No real assertion of notability. He wrote a few articles and gave a few talks is all the article says. Borock (talk) 01:27, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.