Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert midgley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete &mdash;Xezbeth 21:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Herbert midgley


I felt uncomfortable about speedying this, so I'll put it here. Hopefully someone will recognise it for a CSD A7 candidate and zap it. &mdash;Xezbeth 19:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Tagged it as a7.  Cool Blue  talk to me 20:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a speedy It asserts notability, unlikely as it is. If it's a hoax, it cant be a speedy. I removed the tag. DGG 20:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Definitely not notable. Nyttend 20:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:BIO - no reliable secondary sources establishing notability. MastCell Talk 20:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm surprised that User:DGG removed the Speedy Deletion tag? I wonder why... Astrale01talkcontribs 21:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - should have been a speedy delete.-- K u k i ni  hablame aqui 21:06, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Good enough for me. I'll delete this as a WP:SNOW, no point wasting any more time on this. &mdash;Xezbeth 21:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.