Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hercules (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Honky Château. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Hercules (song)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No content, sources, or notability for an article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-plausible search term, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. No awards, no chart, no covers, no WP:RS.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 02:23, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Honky Château. Useful information could be lost if simply deleted. Anyone who is aware of Wikipedia's WP:DAB or WP:MUSTARD guidelines may use this is a search term. --JD554 (talk) 10:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:44, 30 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete non-plausible search term, nothing sourced here to merge. Duffbeerforme (talk) 13:14, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * As I stated above, anybody aware of Wikipedia's guidelines may use it to find an article. No harm is caused by having a redirect. --JD554 (talk) 13:32, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Honky Château. I don't think that there's any useful information here. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC))
 * Redirect. A lack of notability for a separate article, is insufficient reason to ignore the possibility to redirect or merge in favor of deletion. Nominator shows no evidence of having done the research required by WP:BEFORE. (JD554 is right in their assertion that the title is perfectly plausible) - Mgm|(talk) 10:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.