Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Here Comes Peter Cottontail: The Movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Here Comes Peter Cottontail: The Movie

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Zero significant coverage. Fails WP:NFILM. IMDb is unreliable as a source per this discussion. Jalen Folf  (talk)  17:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jalen Folf   (talk)  17:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

*Comment I wouldn't say "zero significant coverage'. There are 2 reviews at DVDTalk (which is a WP:RS) by different editors at  & . Probably not enough on their own, but a start.  Donald D23   talk to me  17:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - Those reviews are actually for the wrong movie. They're both for the 1971 TV special,Here Comes Peter Cottontail, which the subject of this article is purporting to be the sequel to.  In fact, both of those reviews were written well before this film's release date is stated to be.  Rorshacma (talk) 19:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. Meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NFILM.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found a single article from Variety, but nothing else beyond that to establish NFILM has been met. At most this could be mentioned in the main article for the first film, but then we'd need to confirm that this is a sequel. The Variety source says that it was "inspired by" the original, FWIW. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - It does not meet already mentioned criteria (especially WP:NF). Listed references are also not very significant (just IMDB notice and short article about cast of a future animated movie).-- Melaleuca alternifolia  |  talk  06:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.