Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Here Right Now


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Graham Colton. Redirecting as an editorial decision. Consider this a no consensus close. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Here Right Now

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Charted at $153 on the billboard top 200 for a very short time, which may or may not be notable enough for a keep. One single was used on television as well, but failed to chart anywhere. over all notability is borderline. perhaps a redirect as the little bit of content here can help fill up the lacking main article Graham Colton which needs major work. Alan -  talk  23:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep if only because the song is notable to me. CycloneGU (talk) 01:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * comment this isn't about a song, it's about an album, I'm a big fan of Graham Colton myself, but because you and I like the album and songs on it doesn't make it notible. Alan  -  talk  04:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm a bit ambiguous here, I'd be best to clarify. I mean that a certain song from the album is notable, thus I think the album itself could have an argument for being worth keeping even if not as notable.  CycloneGU (talk) 04:15, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * There was plenty of coverage for the album when it was released, unfortunately it's all since gone from the internet, only small articles are left on mostly unreliable sources. I'd like to save the article somehow, but can't find anything to do that with as per sources/refs/cites. Even Graham's own official site has changed and all content back to these days are gone from it. I tried the internet wayback machine, but it's lacking too much. on a personal note, thanks at least for not being like most here pushing opinions, i'm here nominating an article about someone I know and like.. somethign most would never do. Alan  -  talk  04:27, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Baseball   Watcher  21:49, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - If both the artist and a song from the album were notable, I'd favor keeping the article even if the album if itself is not notable. However, Graham Colton himself is just borderline notable; only one song of his is well-known, and he doesn't seem to have made a successful career out of that one song. Hence, the only reason to have an article on the album is because it includes a notable song. That is not enough to justify keeping an article dedicated solely to the album.--Martin IIIa (talk) 23:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge, as it probably only needs a section in the main article. Peter E. James (talk) 23:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Colton is certainly notable, and if, as the nominator has stated "There was plenty of coverage for the album when it was released" then the album is notable. What we have is verifiable and the article can be expanded using sources such as Allmusic's review, Charts & Awards, and credits, and Dallas Morning News. It wouldn't be the best album article we have, but it would be better than deleting it.--Michig (talk) 06:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.