Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heringism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete g1 nonsense, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Heringism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable term, borderline nonsense, prod removed by author Wildthing61476 (talk) 00:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax/joke. JJL (talk) 01:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * speedy delete "What people have to say.  Everyone loves it" - yeah, obvious hoax. Torc2 (talk) 01:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not surprisingly, there are no relevant Google hits outside Wikipedia. We don't get that many newly created and unsourced philosophies/religions on WP:AFD any more, but they are still going to be deleted when we find them. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This would appear to qualify as a blatant hoax that isn't even funny enough to preserve elsewhere. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete religioncruft. JuJube (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Not borderline nonsense, but the full-blown real thing. ◄   Zahakiel   ►  20:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a definite hoax; Google reveals nothing. —  Wen li  (reply here) 04:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 18:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.