Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heritage Hills, Oklahoma City


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 06:19, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Heritage Hills, Oklahoma City

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

After removing all the poorly sourced promotional copy, what you see here in it's totally unreferenced form is all that's left. Prod to WP:TNT delete so perhaps someone other than the neighborhood association or a realtor can write an accurate neutral article. John from Idegon (talk) 05:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Are you kidding me? Gut the article so there's nothing there and then call for deletion. This is an UGLY nom. Subject is clearly notable and covered in reliable independent sources such as here. Article contents should be restored and sourcing improved if that's an issue. Obvious Keep. This nom seems like a bad joke. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:00, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, I can't fathom why the nom would gut the article and then nominate it for deletion, the user above added new refs. Szzuk (talk) 18:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes geographic notability requirements. Also, for phrasing, half of OKC is "near downtown". L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  19:49, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - past precedent is that churches and other historic sites/areas over 100 years old are presumed, but are not automatically, notable. The neighborhood includes at least one registered historic landmark over 100 years old. Bearian (talk) 00:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.