Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herman Mason


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Some of the commentary on this AfD is grossly inappropriate, especially given that the subject is a BLP. Further, there are claims that the topic meets the WP:GNG but are proposing several different redirect options. Beyond that, this discussion has attracted only one detailed argument (by ) beyond the questionable commentary, thus I am going to close this as "no consensus" but with no prejudice against a quick renomination. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Herman Mason

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minimal coverage for a subject that has not gained much attention for personal accomplishments. First link is the only source to specially mention him, while the rest are about a book, a news article that no longer exists, and two links about the college he attended. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Redirect to alpha phi alpha. Passes gng. 64.134.243.113 (talk) 16:07, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

55.149.11.102 (talk) 20:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - Umm I never made a mention of the subject being a black ("colored" is not appropriate terminology just saying) writer. Please strike your comment and consider writing something that will contribute to the Afd.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

108.176.54.106 (talk) 01:03, 31 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

2607:FB90:2490:2C71:E2D1:CEFE:6F58:57F3 (talk) 00:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.