Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermione Way


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Clearer consensus has formed now. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 01:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Hermione Way

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be notable only by association with famous brother.  MBisanz  talk 23:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC) Weak keep Appears to squeak past requirement of secondary sources (article in spectator.co.uk, couple others). Matt Deres (talk) 14:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:43, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Too much a COI with the contributors to this. Not notable enough to warrant an article, especially as the subject is piggybacking on the (questionable) notability of her brother. Parkerparked (talk) 11:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

she is hot but not famous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.33.157.34 (talk • contribs) her brother is famous. she has nice boobs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.33.157.34 (talk • contribs)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - The secondary source mentions are too trivial to warrant a full article. Even, which is a full interview with just her and not her brother, does not really establish notability, as it is only that one piece and not multiple ones that establish her claim to notability. NW ( Talk ) 00:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - she is barely famous and not notable; WP:N requires multiple reliable sources; I see one. No comment on whether she's hot. Bearian (talk) 00:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.